International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea: Search

141. C16 PV11.14

C16 PV11.14 English Version ITLOS/PV.11/14/Rev.1 INTERNATIONAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE LAW OF THE SEA TRIBUNAL INTERNATIONAL DU DROIT DE LA MER 2011 Public sitting held on Thursday, 22 September 2011,

142. C16 PV11.15

C16 PV11.15 English Version ITLOS/PV.11/15/Rev.1 INTERNATIONAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE LAW OF THE SEA TRIBUNAL INTERNATIONAL DU DROIT DE LA MER 2011 Public sitting held on Saturday, 24 September 2011,

143. C16 Judgment 20120314

C16 Judgment 20120314 INTERNATIONAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE LAW OF THE SEA REPORTS OF JUDGMENTS, ADVISORY OPINIONS AND ORDERS Dispute concerning delimitation of the maritime boundary between Bangladesh and

144. A16 Judgment 20120314 DissOp Lucky

A16 Judgment 20120314 DissOp Lucky 235 DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE LUCKY Introduction Upon careful reading of the draft Judgment of the majority of the Tribunal, I fĳind it difffĳicult to concur

145. C17 PV10.1

C17 PV10.1 English Version ITLOS/PV.2010/1/Rev.2 INTERNATIONAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE LAW OF THE SEA TRIBUNAL INTERNATIONAL DU DROIT DE LA MER 2010 Public sitting held on Tuesday, 14 September 2010, at

146. C17 PV10.2

C17 PV10.2 English Version ITLOS/PV.2010/2/Rev.2 INTERNATIONAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE LAW OF THE SEA TRIBUNAL INTERNATIONAL DU DROIT DE LA MER 2010 Public sitting held on Wednesday, 15 September 2010,

147. Relationship with the United Nations

Although the Tribunal was established by a United Nations convention, it is not an “organ” of the United Nations. Even so, it maintains close links with the United Nations and in 1997 the Tribunal

148. C19 Judgment 20140414 Decl Gao

C19 Judgment 20140414 Decl Gao 134 Declaration of Judge Gao 1. I voted against paragraphs 5, 8, 16 and 17 in the Operative Provisions of the Judgment on exhaustion of local remedies, violation by

149. C19 Judgment 20140414 SepOp Lucky

C19 Judgment 20140414 SepOp Lucky 172 Separate Opinion of Judge Lucky I Introduction 1. I did not vote in favour of all the operative paragraphs of the Judgment for reasons that may differ

150. C21 Response Round 1 New Zealand

C21 Response Round 1 New Zealand 156 AVIS CONSULTATIF - CSRP Written Statement of NeZ =ealand INTERNATIONAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE LAW OF THE SEA (CASE NO. 21) REQUEST FOR AN ADVISORY OPINION SUBMITTED